Thursday, May 5, 2011

Just Relax Boys

Ok listen I don't support kiddie porn and I think pedofiles are gross so your not gonna see shit like that on my blog. But you guys need to do me a favor. I don't control who hits this blog.  Bear in mind that readers come in all ages, and they have differnt backgrounds, and as tough as you may have it there's always someone a little worse off. So keep that in mind with the comments you post guys.  We talk a lot of shit on here but were all people and some are struggling with shit we all struggled with. Some have a great support group. Some don't. Some can wait till their 25 to figure it out. Others can't.  So before you diss someone on the comments try to sorta remember yor roots ok?
Thanks,
Scott

22 comments:

  1. Scott: You are quite the sensitive charmer when you want to be.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What might this be in reference to?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ya I saw what was going on in the comments yesterday. Got a little ugly. I feel bad for the kid. Adolescene is tough, gay or straight. For what it's worth you handled it correctly. You actully might have a heart afterall.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Scott,

    It is unfortunate that you had to say this but I have renewed appreciation for you. This is our support group but we still seem to attract some bitchy insensitive people.....You are smart and obviously a better father than gay icon. It takes more skill to care than it does to fuck!


    DP

    ReplyDelete
  5. I thought that might be a kid. He shouldn't be here but he sounds like he's had a bad hand dealt. I can relate to him in certain ways. You're a good man for sticking up for him. Where were you 15 years ago when I needed you HA!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I have no desire to have sex with a minor, but I must say I find the visual of nude young men very pleasing. Perhaps I'm trying to recapture my youth. But the smooth taught skin, the undersize penis, and the bushy pubic region is soothing to the eye. Am I the only one that feels this way or the only one who will admit it?

    ReplyDelete
  7. While you may want to discuss that subject in this forum (anonymous 8:59) it's also a topic that could spiral out of control. We should not be discussing young nude men. Just my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Just don't see anything attractive about underdeveloped bodies per se. What I find stimulating is knowing that these young men have their cherries in place and that it's likely the only thing that's been in contact with their loins is their hands. It's the innocense I suppose.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Nude bodies are over-sexualized. More mirror time and nudist beach time is needed for all.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thanks Scott, will do my best to adhere to that advice.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anon @ 8:59 WTF?? Not cool dude!!

    Good lookin out Scott. Lottsa of smack goin on yesterday!

    Ltr bro.

    ReplyDelete
  12. What'd I miss?
    Celt

    ReplyDelete
  13. A reader who clearly appeared to be underage asked some questions, someone directed him away from an adult site, things got ugly, Super Scott came to his defense. I hope thats the end of it. I'd like to see Scott concentrate on his cock, not others.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Scott, Glad you made your position clear on kiddie porn and pedophiles. All bloggers should do that clearly as possible. Local dude was exchanging photos (kiddie porn) in a chat room. The receiver was a federal agent. Dudes waiting trial sitting in the local jail till Sep. No bail

    ReplyDelete
  15. Nice post, Scotty! If guys can't use a place like this as a support group, what place can they use.
    Sure, there's a lot of bullshit info left by guys who don't always have the best info or knowledge, and a bit of flaming and pitchforks being waved, but overall? dude, you are serving a great purpose - probably larger than you suspect. You express what a lot of guys can't seem to put into words of their own. And THAT is why it's so good to have you back!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Poor choice of words in your response Anonymous 8:59 p.m.! If you're looking for that I recommend finding another blog, not this one. Congratulations Scott of protecting our younger population; we all discovered ourselves at different ages and we should respect everyone!

    Love your blog Scott! Check it every weeknight and occassionally on weekends (wishful thinking).

    Joe

    ReplyDelete
  17. What is going on with the comments to 8:59. He made it clear that it is not a sexual thing with young people. When I see a young body, I don;t lust after it but I envy it as mine was NEVER that good! Blk JAck has a good point though as such discussion can get out of hand.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Welcome to the gay world. there are nasty people out there.
    I work in the gay industry and see it all the time, comes as no surprise that some feel it their right to tell others how to live, what to think and do.
    I was married for 13 years with 2 great kids before I left, it was the hardest thing I have ever done and don't wish it on anyone else.
    My wife was the first and only person I has slept with until I was early 30s when I had my first man sex. She is still one of my best friends and gets on really well with my husband. I get shit because people think I should not have had kids... I would not change a thing, Kids are great.
    love the blog btw.
    Mike

    ReplyDelete
  19. Am I the only one that finds the picture attached to this post to be in direct and obvious contradiction to the point being made? I suggest in future when you point out the conditions here you don't cross a line your making. Anyone can see that while those young bodies are perfectly normal naked on the beach, putting a picture of them on an web page inside an adult only controlled platform moves that picture into eye candy which is nothing more than porn.

    That picture doesn't belong. It's the wrong choice. It was a choice.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Unless the human male has changed drastically since I started having sex with them, the picture above contains young handsome lads and at least two older guys, all over 18 years of age. It is a puzzle to figure out where it might be taken at, tho. At first it looked like a vintage picture of an R&R romp from one of the wars in the tropics. The drift wood looks ocean-like and less like lake-wash. Looking up close, the trees don't look so much like palm trees as much as I had thought, but could very well be tropical, perhaps. With photo-shop-chops, who knows anything any more.

    As I age, it seems the 18+legal-age guys I see clothed or naked read so much younger and immature than when I was one of them. Gets worse every year. Yet they are still the same humans at the same age cohort as they ever were. It is very much a crap-shoot checking by looks alone to see who can be leered at legally and who must be avoided. You can see why proof must now be on file etc. Even if the ID is real in these situations confusion remains. We had a couple of families in our high school, all related, who's boys matured very early, leaving one grade as "kids" and coming back in September as "men". And oh how the senior girls loved the hell out of 'em. Several were bearded, hairy barrel chested men and already balding when we graduated at 17/18 yrs. And yet there were a number of guys who hit puberty very late, and looked way too young to get married and reproduce. Let alone parent a child and there they were churning out the next crop of back-woods rednecks. This confusion and murky-ness around maturity means we must agree on an arbitrary age point and proceed from there. So much easier, if like a tomato, we had to turn squishy and bright red before we waved a weenie in anyone's face.

    Here is a thought experiment, as I hesitated writing any of this above at all, use this only as a thought problem and not post comments to it. :<>: If a vintage pic of a YMCA swimming pool, filled with men and boys swimming naked together, was not pornographic when taken in 1934, nor was not of particular oddity when published later on, then just how many people looking at it in a later age does it take to make it no longer the picture it was, is, and remains today? (one perv, two pervs? an internet of pervs?) At what era in human history does this historical document become changed? I think it does not itself change as a document, or the intent of the document. Now, if the picture is then published in different formats and websites mixed in with other themes: Does the picture become child porn? or have we changed in order to now interpret any non-sexual collection of men or boys pictured inocently bathing together as vile and pornographic? What does this say about them, and what does it say about us?

    We humans are so wrought with sexual ambiguity: We are hard wired to be attracted to our fellow animals at the top of our breeding form/condition in the initial shake out, followed by a host of other factors, varility, size, maturity. Then layer on the cultural factors, sense of humor, personallity, etc. Nice we are not looking to see how shiny each other's fur is. ;-) My, oooh my, that man has the shiny-est sleakest coat! ;-) Good we are not signaling how red our tail feathers are to show health, or how wide our croaking neck flanges expand. But maturing youth male and female as a marker of virility and top breeding form is and will remain a very strong marker for attraction in our species.

    Given all that, the guys on the beach are not porn. I would know it when I see it.

    Your Not-stimulated Package (Seattle)

    ReplyDelete
  21. Agree, the pic is completely unsuitable for the point you are trying to make.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I'm glad you know it when you see it and I'm quite certain there are men around the world spilling cum to pictures just like this. Because you don't see porn in this picture does not mean others won't.

    ReplyDelete